The New York Times weighs in today with this lengthy article–which made it to the front page of the Business section in the always-thick Sunday edition.
Discover more from Adpulp
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
The New York Times weighs in today with this lengthy article–which made it to the front page of the Business section in the always-thick Sunday edition.
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Dan Goldgeier is a Seattle-based copywriter with experience at advertising agencies across the U.S. He is a graduate of the Creative Circus ad school, and currently teaches at Seattle's School of Visual Concepts. Dan is also a columnist for TalentZoo.com and the author of View From The Cheap Seats and Killer Executions and Scrubbed Decks.
All episodes of Ad Chatter are now available on Buzzsprout \ Apple Podcasts \ Spotify \ Stitcher \ Amazon Music \ Google Podcasts \ iHeartRadio
“I love Adpulp, man! The analysis is awesome.” -Ian Schafer
For me the most cogent point in the article is this:
“Time is running out,” said Eric Schmitt, senior analyst at Forrester Research and the author of a recent report called “What Next for TV Advertising?” “At some point, it’s going to be impossible not to acknowledge that the medium is overvalued as an advertising vehicle.”
Mr. Schmitt says he expects that by 2007, time-shifting and ad-skipping will begin putting considerable pressure on the prices that television networks can charge for commercial time.
While this will also take some time, I look forward to the day when TV no longer sits atop the creative pyramid of importance. And whichever medium replaces TV atop said heirarchy needs to be the one that actuallly moves product, be it point-of-sale, internet or advertainment.