We All Know Stock Images Belong Nowhere Near Our Projects, Now There’s Data To Prove It

bits-eyetrack-custom1.jpg
The New York Times has picked up an eye-tracking study by Jakob Nielsen, a Web site consultant and author of a number of books about design and user interface.
Not surprisingly, Neilsen found that some types of pictures are completely ignored while others are scrutinized.

In an aspect of the study comparing a set of products on Pottery Barn’s furniture Web site and a page of televisions on Amazon.com, the research showed that users largely ignored the televisions on Amazon because they were generic, and the image on the screens, usually a “guy on a canoe” or a football player, made the product image even less inviting.
In contrast, when people navigated the Pottery Barn Web site, they engaged with the decorative photos of the bookcases for extended periods of time because they were images of the actual objects for sale.

Go to your Web site now and scrub it of fake filler imagery. Okay? Thanks.

FacebookTwitterGoogle+PinterestLinkedInRedditStumbleUponEmailDiggShare
About David Burn

Native Nebraskan seeking the perfect pale ale in the Pacific Northwest. Copywriter and brand strategist at Bonehook. Co-founder and editor of AdPulp. Contributor to The Content Strategist. Doer of the things written about herein.