You are here: Home / Media Trends / The Non-RSS Subscription Model

The Non-RSS Subscription Model

May 18, 2008 By 2 Comments

My dad’s a retired dairy exec. He used to read The Milkweed, a dairy industry trade rag that’s been in continuos operation for 27 years. He relates to AdPulp through that lens. So, it was neat to see Peter Hardin, The Milkweed’s editor and publisher in this morning’s New York Times.
The_Milkweed.jpg
The Milkweed has over 7500 subscribers and accepts no advertising. Which, of course, is a wonderful way of building trust with one’s audience.
I can’t help but wonder, would you trust us more if we stopped running ads? Would it make for a better pub?

Submit to reddit
Filed Under: Media Trends
About David Burn

I wrote my first ad for a local political candidate when I was 17 (she went on to win her race, and I felt the power of persuasive copy for the first time). Today, I live near Portland, Oregon and spend my days building brands for companies that matter.

  • http://webranding.org/blog/ Tommy

    As to your questions about ads ….
    I think it depends on our audience of course. My guess is most of the people that get your feed (I do) work in advertising/marketing (I do). We understand advertising. Get that in many instance it is how publications generate revenue. So I guess most of us don’t see a problem with RSS ads (I don’t).
    But any audience like diary farmers or construction works I’d think wouldn’t agree. I could be wrong (it has happened) but if I was advising The Milkweed I stress stay away from ads. You might be a short-term gain in revenue, but long-term you might hurt the relationship you’ve developed.
    Or at the very least, I’d suggest a test and see if their numbers changed. Or even better, do what you just did. Ask them.
    Tommy

  • http://mediamandible.com Michael Cohn

    But has The Milkweed ever sold its list of names, or the use of that list? Ever, in 27 years?