Starbucks has 1,482,069 fans on Facebook and 183,729 followers on Twitter at the time of this post. But what does it mean to the bottom line?
The New York Times reminds that “it is difficult to measure the effects of social media — a follower on Twitter does not necessarily translate to a daily Frappuccino drinker.”
Bob Hoffman has even tougher words about brands’ growing reliance on social media. Let’s listen…
Because forced exposure on the web has not been terribly successful, the advertising community is trying to convince itself that the answer is social media. But there’s a big problem. Social media is not like traditional advertising. Consumers have to volunteer for it.
The idea that people will voluntarily “interact with your brand”, or can be tricked, coaxed, or charmed into interacting with it, is a highly suspect proposition for most brands.
I’m sure Chris Bruzzo, vice president for brand, content and online at Starbucks would say Starbucks is the exception, not the rule.
Personally, I think brands need to constantly experiment in a search for the just the right mix of media and messaging. Provided a brand has some good ideas to work with (which never come cheap), a little money can go a long way online.