For Lovemarks To Count They Must Be Genuine Article

The anti-Lovemarks argument just found its voice (or at least one I can readily comprehend), thanks to Rob at Bad Marketing.
He writes: “Lovemarks isn’t complete bunk. The vitriolic response comes because this ad agency has created and hyped the idea, and pretends they can recreate, even manufacture it. Most of us probably have some brand that we have an irrational attachment to, and see the same behavior in people we know. The thing is, these brand relationships weren’t developed overnight, they weren’t manufactured by an ad agency, and it’s insulting to the brands we do love and respect to suggest that some ‘creative team’ can cook up a Lovemark in a matter of weeks and months.”
the_book.gif
In other words, Lovemarks exist, but can only be respected when created via non-manipulative means. I’m cool with that.

About David Burn

Co-founder and editor of AdPulp. I wrote my first ad for a political candidate when I was 17 years old. She won her race and I felt the seductive power of advertising for the first time. I worked for seven agencies in five states before launching my own practice in 2009. Today, I am head of brand strategy and creative at Bonehook in Portland, Oregon.